http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/11/opinion/11brooks.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists David Brooks is struggling to characterize Democrats & Republicans. The data below is apparently-from the Center for Responsive Politics as filtered by Brooks. Profession Donor Ratio Rep:Dem C.E.O.s 1:5 Professors 11:1 Actors 18:1 Self-described authors 36:1 Journalists 93:1 Librarians 223:1 Data from the Center for Responsive Politics allows us to probe the emerging class alignments, but the pattern is the same. Number people and word people are moving apart. Back in the early 1990's, accountants gave mostly to Democrats, but now they give twice as much to the party of Lincoln. Similarly, in the early 1990's, bankers gave equally to the two parties. Now they give mostly to Republicans, though one notices that employees at big banks, like Citigroup and Bank of America, are more likely to give to Democrats. But lawyers are shifting the other way. This year, lawyers gave about $81 million to Democrats and about $31 million to Republicans. Media types are Democratic, of course, but one is dismayed to learn that two-thirds of employee donations at Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation went to Democrats. University of California employees make up the single biggest block of Kerry donors and Harvard employees are second, topping folks from Goldman Sachs and others in the supposedly sell-out/big-money professions. All but 1 percent of the campaign donations made by employees of William & Mary College went to Democrats. In the Harvard crowd, Democrats got 96 percent of the dollars. At M.I.T., it was 94 percent. Yale is a beacon of freethinking by comparison; 8 percent of its employee donations went to Republicans. Lobbyists give equally to both parties. And casino people split their giving, with employees at Harrah's giving mostly to Democrats and employees at MGM Mirage giving mostly to Republicans. ===================================================== MAGAZINE DESK | August 22, 2004, Sunday THE WAY WE LIVE NOW: 8-22-04: IDEA LAB; The Political Brain By STEVEN JOHNSON (NYT) A team of U.C.L.A. researchers analyzed the neural activity of Republicans and Democrats as they viewed a series of images from campaign ads. And the early data suggested that the most salient predictor of a ''Democrat brain'' was amygdala activity responding to certain images of violence: either the Bush ads that featured shots of a smoldering ground zero or the famous ''Daisy'' ad from Lyndon B. Johnson's 1964 campaign that ends with a mushroom cloud. Such brain activity indicates a kind of gut response, operating below the level of conscious control.